Digital Justice and the Right to a Fair Trial: Challenges of Videoconferencing in Criminal Proceedings
Abstract
This study examines remote criminal proceedings in Kazakhstan in light of the right to a fair trial and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining legal source analysis with case study examination of procedural practice. The analysis revealed gaps in the Criminal Procedure Code of Kazakhstan regarding videoconference hearings and identified the central problem of the accused’s objection to remote participation. Remote justice may enhance efficiency, but its application must not compromise fair trial guarantees, particularly effective defense rights and voluntary participation.
Keywords: right to a fair trial; criminal proceedings; remote court proceedings; digitalization; videoconference; European Court of Human Rights practice.
References
Androshchuk, V. V., & Shved, E. N. (2018). The concept of “electronic justice”: Problem statement. In Information Technology and Law: Legal Informatization—2018. Proceedings of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 360–364). Minsk.
Anisimova, A. S. (2019). Electronic justice as an indicator of the information development of society and the state. Civilistics: Law and Procedure, 3(7), 15–17.
Antonov, Ya. V. (2016). Realities and prospects of the development of the electronic justice system in Russian and European practice. Russian Journal of Legal Studies, 4(9), 15–20.
Arkhipova, E. A. (2011). Application of videoconferencing in criminal procedure in Russia and foreign countries. Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, 5(25), 45–49.
Artamonova, E. A. (2012). Certain problems of interrogating a witness and victim through videoconferencing systems in modern criminal proceedings. Court Administrator, 1, 14–17.
Balgyntaev, A. O. (2022). Electronic criminal proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved from https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=34878697&pos=6;-111#pos=6;-111
Begishev, I., Abdullayev, I., Chernov, D., Blagodatskaya, A., Sychanina, S., Kochetkov, E. (2024). Evaluation of the effectiveness of digitalization projects in the field of receiving citizens' appeals, taking into account the specifics of the region. Cadernos educacao tecnologia e sociedade, 17(2), 757-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.n2.757-780
Beskorovaynaya, S., Karimova, D., Akhyadov, E., Kolganov, S., Mamazova, Z., Aleshkov, A. (2025). Protection of Human Rights: Participation of European International Organisations in Regulating the Functioning of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technologies. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 13(1), 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/jch.v13i1.44685
Borisova, L. V. (2020). Electronic justice as a form of judicial protection in Russia. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 15(6), 105–111.
Bryantseva, O. V., & Soldatkina, O. L. (2019). Electronic justice in Russia: Problems and solutions. Bulletin of Kutafin Moscow State Law University, 12(64), 97–104.
Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
Council of Europe. (2001). Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. Strasbourg, 8 November 2001. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/168008157f
Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 231-V. (July 4, 2014). Retrieved from: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575852
Fedorchuk, Y., Dorenko, K., Larina, T., Kondratuk, D., & Lakhin, D. (2025). Digitization Of Education and The Information Environment as a Basis for digital Services: A Case Study. Revista Conrado, 21(102), e4332.
Grudtsina, L., Komleva, T., Shelepina, E., Shmakova, E. (2025). Information Environment As The Basis (Platform) For The Provision Of Digital Services. RISUS-Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 16(2), 107-113.
Kachalova, O. V., & Kachalov, V. I. (2019). The right to a fair trial and the special procedure of trial: Is there a conflict? Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 445, 197–202.
Lupo, G. (2016). Evaluating e-justice: The design of an assessment framework for e-justice systems. In K. Benyekhlef, J. Bailey, J. Burkell, & F. Gélinas (Eds.), E-Access to Justice (pp. 53–94). University of Ottawa Press.
Lupo, G., & Velicogna, M. (2018). Making EU justice smart? Looking into implementation of new technologies to improve the efficiency of cross-border justice services delivery. In Smart Technologies for Smart Governments: Transparency, Efficiency and Organisational Issues (pp. 195–221).
Markova, T. (2024). Few more words about the violation of the right of the accused to use the help of a lawyer. Legal Studies, 1, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2024.1.69475
Markovicheva, E. V. (2021). Ensuring the right to a fair trial in criminal proceedings: Lessons of the pandemic. Legal Bulletin of Samara University, 7(1), 76–81.
Maslennikova, L. N., & Sushina, T. E. (2020). The experience of digitalisation of criminal proceedings in the Federal Republic of Germany and the possibilities of its use in the digitalisation of criminal procedure in Russia. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 6, 214–224.
Mikheenkova, M. A. (2012). The principle of a fair trial in criminal cases in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11: Law, 1, 70–78.
Miller, J. M., & Blumstein, A. (2020). Crime, justice & the COVID-19 pandemic: Toward a national research agenda. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 515–524.
Mishchenko, E. V., Nikuradze, N. O., & Marina, E. A. (2022). Criminal procedure in the conditions of global digitalisation of society. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 15(8), 1082–1093.
Order of the Head of the Department for Supporting the Activities of the Courts under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Apparatus of the Supreme Court of RK) No. 6001-18-7-6/188. (June 7, 2018). “On approval of the Rules for the technical use of videoconferencing.” Registered in the Ministry of Justice of RK on June 27, 2018 No. 17124. Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2000021521
Ramaldanov, Kh. Kh. (2022). Digital evidence obtained through videoconferencing systems. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 17(11), 124–131.
Sidorov, V. N. (2024). La adaptación legal en la era de la transformación digital. Revista Do Curso De Direito Do UNIFOR, 15(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v15i2.1912
Silnov, M. A., & German, A. S. (2012). Practice of applying videoconferencing in criminal proceedings. Criminal Procedure, 9, 56–59.
Suleimenova, G. Zh. (2020). Consideration of criminal cases by the court via videoconference: procedural regulation and realities. Retrieved from https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=38147903&pos=41;21#pos=41;21
Tereshchenko, E., Ivanchenko, E., Meleshkin, V., Zhuzhgov, I., Erokhina, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Law: Theoretical and Legal Features. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 13(1), 133-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/jch.v13i1.44667
Tleubaev, D. K. (2021). Digitalization of criminal procedure in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Formation and practice of application. Colloquium-journal. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovizatsiya-ugolovnogo-protsessa-v-respublike-kazahstan-stanovlenie-i-praktika-primeneniya
Usmanova, Y., Khudoykina, T., Adayeva, O. (2025). Simulation and social learning: strategies for the communicative training of future lawyers. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 15(3), 943-954. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16916134
Velicogna, M. (2018). E-justice in Europe: From national experiences to EU cross-border service provision. In International E-government Development: Policy, Implementation and Best Practice (pp. 39–72). Granada.
Voskobitova, L. A. (2020). Using a functional approach for the digitalisation of criminal proceedings. Bulletin of Kutafin Moscow State Law University, 10, 34–51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v13i1.50369
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
